Described in the handoff.
Prior work and blockers reported in the supplied work-tree review. Not re-run or independently verified for this website.
Persistent intelligence. Useful verticals. Controlled action. The destination is ambitious; the route is evidence-bound.
The site follows the supplied blueprint. Historical results are not a live audit, proposals are not shipped features, and research ideas are not guarantees.
Blueprint · p. 2Prior work and blockers reported in the supplied work-tree review. Not re-run or independently verified for this website.
The architecture, feature families, control experience and delivery sequence are engineering specifications.
Frontier capabilities need baselines, failure criteria and promotion gates. Evidence may change the direction.
Reported posture: not generally released. The handoff describes guided legal, research, coding, knowledge, operations and Growthroom workflows, plus local review checks and encrypted backups.
The same review records an unreachable local model endpoint in a later direct check. Live Kali execution, broad PC control, runnable generated code, production adapters, encrypted live storage and fresh-PC delivery are not established. P.S.T. parity also remains outstanding.
The underlying verification artifacts were not independently supplied. Test counts and catalog size do not establish feature completeness.
Reported baseline and priorities · pp. 5–6Domain workspaces above a shared intelligence core. Controlled execution beneath it. Context, authority and evidence carried through the entire journey.
Blueprint · p. 7Conversation, mission board, evidence explorer, approvals and an accessible desktop.
Task state, model routing, planning, critique, verification and resource budgets.
Source store, claim ledger, project graph, personal context and retention controls.
Identity, deterministic policy decisions, exact-plan approvals, leases, revocation and audit.
Typed adapters, isolated code jobs, the DJINN broker and approved provider connections.
Artifacts, provenance manifests, restore points, result verification and replay.
Four waves. Five slices per wave. Open any slice to see the actual build objective, acceptance criteria, evidence receipt and dependency from the blueprint.
PROPOSED ORDER / NO COMPLETION CLAIMSExpose a baseline report through the existing CLI: source hashes, current tests, doctor, missing dependencies and unfinished ledger entries.
A changed file invalidates the old receipt; a missing dependency is shown as blocked, not passed.
Baseline manifest + regression log.
Existing workspace only.
Repair access to the already installed model service; display route identity, unavailable state and cancellable responses.
Prove success, unreachable service, timeout and cancellation without downloading a new model.
Live smoke receipt + failure fixtures.
01; local-service permission.
Complete a keyboard-only path from startup to evidence review, approval denial and export.
Check focus, screen-reader names, scaling and interrupted-session recovery on the actual desktop.
Manual acceptance record + UI tests.
02; interactive desktop access.
Implement the selected protected-storage path for one bounded record family, including its journal and temporary files.
Migrate a synthetic fixture, interrupt the migration, recover it and inspect for plaintext residue.
Migration/recovery receipt.
01; crypto design decision.
Expose rotate, backup and restore for that protected store with explicit operator confirmation.
Wrong keys fail safely; interrupted rotation recovers; a restored record matches its provenance.
Rotation + restore rehearsal.
04; key/recovery policy.
Expose claim/source inspection, correction and retirement with derived-index invalidation.
A retired source cannot silently support a new answer; prior authorized history remains explainable.
Memory lifecycle fixture.
04-05; retention decision.
Bind a typed proposed operation to its parameters, scope, evidence revision and expiring permission.
An edited plan, revoked approval or duplicate request cannot obtain a fresh execution by accident.
Policy and adverse-path receipt.
01; no live target required.
Take one permitted document or HTTPS source through fetch, extraction, source-span citation and a reviewable brief.
Reject unsupported content, malformed input and stale evidence; preserve a useful partial result.
Source-to-brief evidence pack.
06; approved access policy.
For a bounded Maine authority set, capture official-source provenance and source-date checks in the draft workflow.
A missing or stale authority blocks a currentness claim; the document remains review-required.
Corpus receipt + draft fixture.
08; corpus stewardship.
Run one generated synthetic program in a provisioned isolated environment through the closed dispatcher.
Deny unapproved network and host writes; enforce time/resource limits; preserve failure output.
Host-isolation + test receipt.
07; provisioning approval.
Select a single production system and expose a scoped read with account identity, freshness and evidence.
Wrong account, expired credentials, pagination and rate limits produce controlled behavior.
Adapter contract + live read proof.
07; owner-selected credentials.
Extend that adapter with one previewable operation, duplicate protection and supported rollback or compensation.
A changed preview needs reapproval; retry does not duplicate work; partial failure is visible.
Write/recovery receipt.
11; explicit write scope.
Enable configured, consented final-response playback with cancellation, text fallback and privacy controls.
Cancel mid-playback; reject absent consent; survive provider outage without blocking chat.
Playback smoke + failure proof.
02; voice credential/consent.
Admit one implemented donor feature into shared contracts and create a P.S.T. parity package.
Validate exposed workflow and migration in isolated fixtures; leave the other workspace untouched.
Pinned donor manifest + parity pack.
06-07; transfer scope only.
Create, review, seal and export a synthetic engagement plan from the native interface.
Excluded assets, missing ownership evidence and altered plan revisions prevent promotion.
Scope receipt + UI acceptance.
07; no target execution.
Expose a typed tool job to a synthetic worker with environment binding, expiry, quotas and cancellation.
Expired or revoked leases fail before dispatch; duplicate submissions stay controlled.
Broker adversarial fixture.
15; synthetic execution only.
Add an explicitly approved runtime profile with pinned tools, restricted integration and reset capability.
Inspect mounts, interop, network policy and cleanup; fail closed when a required boundary is absent.
Environment and isolation receipt.
16; new provisioning authority.
Use a reviewed low-impact profile against allowlisted synthetic lab assets and normalize its artifacts.
An out-of-scope destination is denied; tool errors remain errors rather than inferred results.
Lab inventory evidence pack.
17; sealed lab engagement.
Link a lab observation to raw artifacts, corroboration, limitations and a redacted engagement report.
An unsupported finding cannot be promoted; changed artifacts invalidate verification.
Finding/report provenance bundle.
18; verification rubric.
Exercise live revocation plus one approved reversible lab change and a scoped retest.
Stop/revoke behavior is measured; cleanup is checked; closure requires valid retest evidence.
Stop/recovery/retest receipt.
16-19; distinct change approval.
Reconcile these proposals against the active ledger before assigning batch numbers. Completion requires exposed behavior, synthetic acceptance, full regression, doctor and a tested-byte receipt.
These eight proposed stages guide promotion. They are not a reconstruction of the handoff’s unnamed eleven blocked release gates.
Blueprint · p. 25Restore chat, runtime truth, basic desktop, cancellation and offline behavior.
Prove protected live storage, source provenance, scoped memory and recovery.
Policy, approval revisioning, budgets and the first isolated execution path.
Deepen domain evidence, deliver a real adapter and validate transfer contracts.
Prove scope, isolation, tool profiles, normalization, revocation and retesting.
Complete journeys on selected authorized systems with recoverability.
Signed delivery, clean-machine proof, upgrades, accessibility and known limits.
Promote domains and frontier work through the same evidence discipline.
Not a promise of human-level general intelligence. A research agenda with measurable questions, held-out evaluations and explicit promotion gates.
Blueprint · p. 16Track entities, commitments and changes. Can it resolve later tasks with fewer corrections than retrieval alone?
Combine owner-shared screen, text, image and optional audio. Does it improve held-out tasks without increasing privacy or action errors?
Route complementary specialists and preserve disagreement. Does it outperform the best single route at matched cost and latency?
Compare possible plans before acting. Do predicted consequences match controlled, reversible outcomes?
Propose reusable workflows from successful work. Can reviewed skills generalize without widening permissions?
Maintain goals and suggest timely next steps. Does the owner accept more suggestions than they dismiss or undo?
The planned P.S.T. edition keeps a distinct identity, separate memories, credentials and permissions. Its proposed DJINN access begins with an explicitly configured learning lab—not inherited administrator access.
Updated P.S.T. artwork and delivery parity need separate approval and validation. No finished P.S.T. build or rebranded logo is represented here.
Blueprint · p. 10The mission, architecture, feature sets and delivery gates. Published together, with a clear distinction between reported work, proposed engineering and experimental research.


Source documents supplied for this website. They describe a development direction, not a public application release.